A lot of different opinions have been voiced in the past few weeks regarding the Game of Thrones final season. The overall consensus seems to be one of disappointment, myself included. I found that the writing was clumsy and the pacing jarring. Character deaths lacked emotional depth and plot twists felt unnatural.
I acknowledge that it is difficult to bring such a massive story to a conclusion that satisfies everyone, but considering that Game of Thrones took a nose dive as soon as the storyline surpassed the books, I have to wonder if the writers are only as good as their source material, and if they really understood the characters they were adapting for the screen.
This seems evident with the way my favourite character, Daenerys Targaryen, was portrayed over the last two seasons. A lot of fans seem divided over this. I think both sides make good points, but ultimately this division has occurred because the writers failed to understand or reconcile the extreme characteristics of Dany`s nature.
Dany, first and foremost, is a bad ass. She is unrelentingly towards cruel and wicked people who take advantage of the weak, poor, and destitute. She is the champion of those who have no power, because she knows what it`s like to be powerless, overlooked, and underestimated.
Yes, Dany often demonstrates cruelty, ruthlessness, and bloodthirsty desires. No one is saying she doesn’t. What she never demonstrates is a lack of principles and a lack of empathy. Dany knows what she stands for and she sticks to it, sometimes to an extreme.
In the penultimate episode, Dany struggles with the Machiavellian issue of fear vs. love, but Dany never cared about being loved, not really. She cared about justice and empowering those without power. As a result, she was loved, but that never motivated her. That is why her conversation with Jon, before the destruction of King’s Landing, did not feel sufficient in justifying what she did.
At one point, Dany had expressed that she didn`t want to be queen of the ashes. She didn`t want to destroy King’s Landing and the innocent people living there. Of course, that`s what she ended up doing, which should have felt like a tragic irony. So what happened? How could her principles, which she so fiercely upheld before arriving in Westeros, suddenly change?
This was the biggest (and laziest) way the writers failed Dany. In yet another speech delivered by Tyrion, it is suggested that Daenerys could never actually distinguish between right and wrong. Since everything she had previously done was seen as good, and people loved her for it, she came to believe that anything she did was good and right. In other words, we are flat out told that the person we thought Dany was for the last six seasons (not counting the final two) was completely false.
Needless to say, that explanation doesn’t hold up. If anything, Dany`s world is very black and white. She has a keen sense of injustice. Her behavior and good intentions reflect that. People who are cruel, she deals with cruelly. People who are powerless or innocent, she shows mercy and compassion. Dany has never confused these things in the past, why should she now?
This is the question that the writers neglected to answer. Instead, they flipped a coin and decided to lean solely on Dany’s ruthless nature and conveniently forgot that she is also a person of great compassion. This is, in my opinion, the definition of contrived, not to mention unnecessary, considering Jon doesn’t ascend the thone. What the writers didn’t seem to realize is that the two halves of Dany’s personality have always made her an excellent candidate to be a dictator: promising change and reform, giving a voice to the people, and ruling with an iron fist once in power.
Dany becoming the Mad Queen is a plausible and even inevitable path for her, but the road to get there was poorly made, forced, and ultimately failed, in a way that felt true to her character, to bring her story to a satisfying and convincing end.